Showing posts with label Cities and sustainable development. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cities and sustainable development. Show all posts

May 2, 2015

Cities and Sustainable Development

 
Jeffrey D. Sachs / Professeur à l'université de Columbia |

by Jeffrey D. Sachs - Tacloban in the Philippines has joined the growing list of cities – including New Orleans, Bangkok, Moscow, New York, Beijing, Rio de Janeiro, and Port-au-Prince, to name just a few – pummeled in recent years by climate catastrophes. So the global development agenda should empower cities to help lead the way to sustainability.

NEW YORK – Tacloban in the Philippines has now joined the growing list of cities – including New Orleans, Bangkok, Moscow, New York, Beijing, Rio de Janeiro, and Port-au-Prince, to name just a few – pummeled in recent years by climate catastrophes. Many of the world’s largest cities, built on seacoasts and rivers, face the threat of rising sea levels and intensifying storms. So the new global development agenda now taking shape should empower cities to help lead the way to sustainable development in the twenty-first century.
The importance of cities in today’s world economy is unprecedented. Until the Industrial Revolution, human history was overwhelmingly rural. Only around 10% of people lived in cities. Today, the share of urbanites is around 53% and is likely to rise to around 67% by 2050.
Because per capita incomes are higher in cities than in rural areas, the world’s cities today are estimated to account for more than 80% of global income, with the largest 600 accounting for around half. Most of the new jobs over the next few decades will be created in cities, offering livelihoods to hundreds of millions of young people and, as China and Brazil have demonstrated, helping to slash extreme poverty.
Cities are also the innovation hubs for public policy. Every day, mayors are called on to get the job done for residents. They are the ones responsible for providing safe water, garbage collection, safe housing, infrastructure, upgraded slums, protection from disasters, and emergency services when catastrophes hit. So it is not surprising that while national governments often are paralyzed by partisan politics, city governments foster action and innovation.
In the United States, for example, Martin O’Malley, Baltimore’s former mayor and now Maryland’s popular governor, pioneered the use of advanced information systems for urban management. New York City’s outgoing mayor, Michael Bloomberg, worked relentlessly to implement a new sustainability plan (called PlaNYC). And the city’s incoming mayor, Bill de Blasio, is championing a bold program of educational innovations to narrow the vast gaps in income, wealth, and opportunity that divide the city.
Sustainable development offers a new concept for the world economy in the twenty-first century. Rather than focusing solely on income, sustainable development encourages cities, countries, and the world to focus simultaneously on three goals: economic prosperity, social inclusion, and environmental sustainability.
Economic prosperity speaks for itself. Social inclusion means that all members of society – rich and poor, men and women, majority and minority groups – should have equal rights and equal opportunities to benefit from rising prosperity. And environmental sustainability means that we must reorient our economies and technologies to provide basic services like safe water and sanitation, combat human-induced climate change, and protect biodiversity. Achieving these three goals will require good governance, public finance, and effective institutions.
Cities will be in the front lines of the battle for sustainable development. Not only do they face direct threats; they also have the best opportunities to identify and deliver solutions. As high-density, high-productivity settlements, cities can provide greater access to services of all kinds – including energy, water, health, education, finance, media, transport, recycling, and research – than can most rural areas. The great challenge for cities is to provide this access inclusively and sustainably.
A significant part of the solution will come through advanced technologies, including information systems and materials science. The information and communications revolution has spawned the idea of the “smart city,” which places the relevant technologies at the heart of systems that collect and respond to information: smart power grids, smart transport networks (potentially including self-driving vehicles), and smart buildings and zoning.
The advances in materials science open the possibility of much more energy-efficient residences and commercial buildings. Cities also give rise to the opportunity to combine public utilities, as when urban power plants use the steam released in electricity generation to provide hot water and heating to residents.
Yet technology will be only part of the story. Cities need to upgrade their governance, to allow for a greater role for poorer and more marginalized communities, and to enable much more effective coordination across city lines when a metropolitan area is home to many individual cities. Metropolitan governance is therefore crucial, as smart cities require networks that operate at the metropolitan scale.
When the metropolitan scale is recognized, the importance of leading urban areas is even more remarkable. New York City has around 8.4 million people, but the NYC metropolitan area has roughly 25 million people, with an economy estimated at about $1.4 trillion per year. If this metropolitan area were a country, it would rank about 14th in the world in GDP terms.
A wise political doctrine known as subsidiarity holds that public-policy challenges should be assigned to the lowest level of government able to address them, thereby ensuring maximum democratic participation in problem solving and the greatest opportunity to tailor solutions to genuine local needs. While some issues – for example, a national highway or rail system – require national-level problem solving, many key challenges of sustainable development are best confronted at the urban level.
The world’s governments are now negotiating the Sustainable Development Goals, which will guide the world’s development agenda from 2015 to 2030. In an important meeting on September 25, the United Nations General Assembly agreed that the SDGs would be adopted at a global summit in September 2015, with the next two years used to select the priorities.
An urban SDG, promoting inclusive, productive, and resilient cities, would greatly empower tens of thousands of cities worldwide to take up the cause of sustainable development for their own citizens, their countries, and the world.


Apr 13, 2013

Theme 3 - Cities and sustainable development - Speaking Presentations



Group work activity:
Prepare a speaking presentation on your city!
It will include a visual presentation.
 Explain its main features and development towards sustainability:

-     Housing, transportation, waste management, water, vegetation and so on

-     The main problems / challenges linked to these projects.

Give your point of view: Is this city really developing sustainably or not? To what extent? (think of the three dimensions of sustainable development -environmental/ social/ economical)

You will find some Internet links below:





Work assesment:

Organisation and Content - 5 points:
clear organization and layout / accuracy of information / good sharing-out of the work

Visual Presentation - 5 points:
clear presentation / relevance and variety of documents / Use of English

Speaking during presentation - 10 points:

Fluency / pronunciation / speaking and not reading / Use of English
 

Mar 13, 2012

THEME 3 - Cities and Urbanisation in the UK

  • Urban Sprawl

How did Britain become an urban nation from it's rural roots? The industrial revolution has seen our cities swell beyond all recognition.



  • New Manchester
In one human lifetime Britain's industrial landscape has changed beyond recognition. Manchester has reinvented itself. Factories have been replaced by leisure and culture, and the biggest and tallest statement of the new aspirations is Beetham Tower.



  •  The changing face of London
Aerial shots and archive footage are used to introduce London Docklands and to outline its long history. During the late 1930s, London Docks was the busiest port in the world but, by the late 1970s, the docks had become obsolete and the area had become a derelict wasteland. Archive footage is also used to show how the docks were transformed during the 1980s and 1990s by the London Docklands Development Corporation into a successful centre for trade.

Jan 25, 2012

THEME 3 - Green Building


Case Study: BedZED

BedZED from the south - credit BioRegional


Beddington Zero Energy Development is the UK’s largest mixed use sustainable community. It was designed to create a thriving community in which ordinary people could enjoy a high quality of life, while living within their fair share of the Earth’s resources.
BedZED was initiated by BioRegional and ZEDfactory, and developed by Peabody housing association. It was completed and occupied in 2002. The community comprises 50% housing for sale, 25% shared ownership and 25% social housing for rent.
People move to BedZED with typical lifestyles, and over the years change their behaviour significantly. The holistic design works on three levels:
1.the design solves problems such as heating and water usage;
2. the design and services offered help people make sustainable choices such as walking rather than driving; and
3. the community have created their own facilities and groups to improve quality of life and reduce their environmental impact.

Mechanical & Engineering systems - credit_ARUP

Key Facts

Energy: 81% reduction in energy use for heating, 45% reduction in electricity use (compared to local av.).

Transport: 64% reduction in car mileage 2,318km/year (compared to national av.).

Water: 58% reduction in water use 72 litres/person/day (compared to local av.).

Waste: 60% waste recycled.
Food: 86% of residents buy organic food.

Community: residents know 20 neighbours by name on average.






Beyond green buildings: creating different ways of living


Improving the energy efficiency of buildings will not deliver the step change in carbon savings we need for true sustainability unless wider societal change takes place, according to Pooran Desai, the co-founder of the organisation that was instrumental in delivering the UK's best known sustainable community Beddington Zero Energy Development (BedZED).
"If society is to successfully achieve meaningful improvements in sustainable living, while reducing greenhouse gas emissions, we need to look beyond what is being built and focus on creating different ways of living. Constructing greener buildings is only part of the solution," argues Desai.

Societal change

"Current building regulations deliver reasonable levels of energy efficiency. Therefore, constructing to standards that are well beyond the minimum often does not deliver the environmental benefits we might expect," Desai explains. "As an industry we continue to overestimate the impact of buildings on greenhouse gas emissions and underestimate aspects such as transport, food, waste and behaviour. Although we must improve on them, current building regulations reduce emissions from space heating by almost 70% over a Victorian home. Code level 4 reduces space heating by a further 15% on this baseline, while the marginal benefit of progressing on to code level 6 is only another 5% which in fact amounts to only about 0.5% of greenhouse gas footprint – into the realms of diminishing returns."

Buildings in use

"In fact, regulations that focus on the building fabric and resulting emissions might be the best approach rather than wider codes, because the major part of emissions from buildings are not determined by what is built but all the things people do in those buildings – the appliances they choose to fit and how they are used – which arguably are not usefully considered to be part of the remit of building regulations or building standards. These issues are about sustainable living, and cover everything from food to recycling to transport. Behavioural change, or making it easy for people to lead sustainable lifestyles, needs to play a key role in the way a building is occupied and utilised. Finally, the decarbonisation of the energy supply will need to be addressed if greenhouse gas emissions are to be reduced significantly. Ultimately, building codes are only useful to the extent that they support sustainable lifestyles."

Different view

"What is needed is a way of looking at a new infrastructure for society that supports a different type of lifestyle. The built environment has an important part to play in achieving sustainable consumption, but focusing purely on the way a building is constructed and used sends misleading messages.
"Although I am a great supporter of building standards, if not viewed in context, they can misdirect effort. Achieving a BREEAM Excellent rating is a good idea, and should be encouraged, but there is often little point in going the extra mile and gaining BREEAM Outstanding whilst lifestyle issues are not addressed," says Desai.

Ecological footprint

Desai bases his observations on work undertaken at BedZED. Monitoring during the project was showing average electricity consumption 45% lower than in the surrounding area and heating 81% less. By reducing car parking spaces and introducing London's first club car, surveys showed a 65% reduction in private car mileage.
At the time, there was a lot of debate on regeneration of the Thames Gateway, with some 200,000 homes forecast to be built. Desai and his team started modelling the environmental savings which could come from implementing the strategies taken at BedZED across the Thames Gateway. They also started using ecological footprinting as a headline indicator of sustainability, including food and waste impacts as well as carbon.

Behaviour change

"By targeting CO2 savings in the planned new homes, by building to high energy efficiency standards, although a 32% reduction in CO2 emissions from the homes was achievable, this translated to an overall reduction in ecological footprint of a shockingly low 4%. It was only when we started reducing transport, waste and food impacts and including behaviour change that we really started to achieve some decent overall ecological footprint savings," says Desai.
"Yet, the development of sustainable communities remains dominated by green building design. We often hear statements such as 'our buildings contribute nearly half of all our CO2 emissions' followed by the assumption that we will make large environmental gains by constructing buildings to high environmental standards. As an industry, we continue to fail to appreciate from where our environmental impacts arise."

Buildings versus what people do in them

To be effective, Desai believes we need to develop a better understanding of the relative contributions of building fabric versus appliances, food, transport, consumer goods, waste and the other parts which make up our lifestyles. The energy consumption in buildings is partly to do with what we build, and a growing part is what people do in those buildings – the domestic, commercial and industrial appliances which are fitted and how they are used. There is only limited value in considering the energy consumption from these appliances as part of the building. Desai suggests the following analogy: just because the majority of food is consumed in buildings, there is only a limited amount we can do in trying to drive sustainability of the food system through building design or standards. There is not much to be gained from saying buildings are responsible for 95% of impacts associated with food.
"Although it is essential that we make our buildings greener, particularly by refurbishing older stock, it actually won't reduce our overall environmental impact nearly as much as we might first assume," he says.

GHG not CO2

Desai believes that we can start to unpick the confusion around CO2 emissions figures and how it relates to other measures such as greenhouse gases and ecological footprint. The most quoted government figures for CO2 emissions are what should really be described as "direct CO2 emissions" or "territorial CO2 emissions".
These figures represent the CO2 directly emitted by any region or country from burning fossil fuels within its own territorial boundaries. This amounts to around 8.8 tonnes of CO2 a person a year in the UK. However, the territorial CO2 emissions figures don't include international shipping or aviation which add a further 0.7 tonnes a person a year. Adding in the net impact of goods and services we import into the UK gives us a CO2 footprint of 12.08 tonnes.
Even this figure does not include the basket of greenhouse gases (GHG) such as methane and nitrous oxides in addition to CO2. The UK's GHG footprint is 16.34 tonnes of CO2 equivalent a person a year – 86% larger than the original territorial CO2 emissions figure of 8.8 tonnes. If territorial CO2 emissions is used as a guide, the global warming effect of emissions from imported goods, agriculture and international travel is underestimated, and the importance of fossil fuels burned directly, for example, to heat and power our buildings, is overestimated.

Creating sustainable lifestyles

"If we look at ecological footprinting as the headline indicator of sustainability, things look even more different as our CO2 footprint accounts for only 65% of our ecological footprint. A person living in a home built to current building regulations might be releasing 1.5 tonnes of CO2 to provide their heat and power. This equates to 17% of territorial CO2 emissions, 12% CO2 footprint, 9% of GHG footprint but only about 6% of ecological footprint," explains Desai.
The necessary step change in environmental savings can only be made when society focuses on creating whole sustainable lifestyles – making it attractive and affordable for people to live without being dependent on cars, where recycling is made easy and where everyone has easy access to local, organic, seasonal produce – for which BioRegional coined the term One Planet Living. This framework is now being applied internationally to create communities focused on sustainable lifestyles not just green buildings, including the recently completed 172 apartment, car-free One Brighton development by Crest Nicholson and BioRegional Quintain.
Desai concludes by saying: "We need energy efficient buildings but we don't need to perform expensive engineering or architectural gymnastics to get decent savings, after which we can focus on other aspects of our lifestyles."